I don't like analyzing literature; I'm not good at analyzing literature. I don't see myself using literary analysis in my future career.
Yet, as an English major with a Writing Specialization, I have to do just this. Time and again, I'm given a novel to read and assigned to come up with some claim about it in 5-6 pages. I'm not okay with that. Why is it so important?
Dr. Abdalla said to me in a one-on-one today, "If you want to write, you have to be able to understand and analyze literature." I had just told her, "I don't analyze literature... ever." I was rather frustrated. She was going over the revised introduction to my first paper from American Indian Lit, a class I struggled through last quarter. She said I needed a stronger thesis. All the while, I knew she could see my face reflecting how my heart was sinking. She commented on it and gave me some advice on how to elaborate my thesis, and I left.
I have a better idea now of how to rework the entire paper, but I'm not going to enjoy it. I wasn't born to analyze literature. What kind of job is that? A teacher? I can't teach; I get too easily frustrated with people who write below their grade level. I guess that's part of my patience issue.
How else would one use this skill? As the editor of an anthology? The author of academic literary journals? I don't want to do that? I want to write original pieces, fiction and non-fiction alike, not referencing anyone else's work, except for the occasional allusion to contemporary books and movies that everyone will recognize. Do i need to now how to analyze literature to do that? I don't think so! I believe that if someone is meant to be a good writer, they'll recognize themes and meanings in stories simply by reading all the time, and reading good books. Your reading will influence your writing, guaranteed. In my opinion, if you only read Twilight and you think that it's the best piece of work in a century, you're not going to be a good writer. Stick to things that have stood the test of time: Shakespeare, Chaucer, Dickens, Orwell, Tolstoy, Stevenson, Kipling! Read good writing, and read it often, and you will naturally become a writer. If you want to be, of course.
Furthermore, I certainly don't need literary analysis skills to be a copy editor or a food critic, possible careers I've been mulling over for a while now. I've been finding, through being a writing tutor and the copy desk chief at the same time, that my strengths are more suited for an office job where I am in charge of other people and all we do is correct technical errors in the work of professional writers who are in the field because they want to write. Tutoring people who may or may not even be at a college writing level is wearing on me. I love seeing the "aha" moment in a student, and this job might be more enjoyable if that happened more often. Instead, I am faced with people whose first language is not English, staring at me in confusion as I struggle to explain to them basic grammar rules that will make their sentences clearer. They deserve someone who is passionate about helping them, not someone who would much rather be writing her own creative non-fiction in an office in Seattle, while waiting for news stories to come in that she can edit.